- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 05:50:24 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 12:50:53 UTC
Well, in theory even names that existing code uses should be web-compatible, as long as the existing code doesn't do something particularly weird like mixing together DOM nodes and other objects, and assuming the presence of `obj.root` means it's a non-DOM node. Which, apparently, several sites are doing for `rootNode`.... But I'd still think we could try those other names. Can someone confirm that the two sites @rniwa mentions have the same problems in Chrome Canary, just in case it's some weird browser-specific interaction? If it's something weird then maybe we have more alternatives for working around it. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-216226513
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 12:50:53 UTC