Re: [whatwg/streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294)

> Hmm. I still like keeping BYOB in those names, because BYOB is the new capability on top of the default. ...

In addition to https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/294#issuecomment-202748216, I'm thinking about the case in which we need to introduce the read() with ack functionality. If we introduce the feature, we would need to also add a new interface to the controller. Then, the controller will gain one more new feature in addition to BYOB. Considering such possibility, I was leaning toward giving more general name to it. Of course, we could just add a new controller. WDYT?

> Among byob, buffer-fed, and buffer-provided I think byob is pretty good. Maybe it is just because we have been staring at that for a few months though. I think buffer-fed is better than buffer-provided probably.

OK. Let's go in "byob".

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/294#issuecomment-203956561