Re: [w3c/manifest] Poorly coded example on w3c (#437)

@ayumihamsaki, also, please note that having the two "sizes": "64x64", was deliberate - because they discriminate by `"type":`. As Gecko and Edge, for instance, don't not support webp, they would skip over that icon. 

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/437#issuecomment-203710990