Re: [webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65)

Note additional discussion here:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2016JanMar/0104.html

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Cameron McCormack <notifications@github.com
> wrote:

> Working on finishing off @mikewest <https://github.com/mikewest>'s patch:
> 8f0ff87
> <https://github.com/heycam/webidl/commit/8f0ff87caf75ecf6e89bc2700859bbce9c3fa795>
>
> Since the document.domain stuff has been removed, does that mean we can
> avoid all of the SecurityException throwing and rely only on exposure? Or
> are there still ways to get access to the Function objects from elsewhere
> and call them on objects in the non-secure context?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/65#issuecomment-199651152>
>


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/65#issuecomment-199789211