Re: [webcomponents] defined promise (#427)

> It also doesn't make terribly much sense; if you have the class present, then you've probably already registered it

I started with a property on the instance (like `:defined`), but found myself needlessly creating elements just to monitor their definition. So yeah, your proposal works.

Really not sure what I was thinking, putting the property on classes that clearly won't exist yet :/

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/427#issuecomment-194695130

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 06:36:24 UTC