Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921)

> Is this mainly for handling fetches? If so, it feels like a same-origin foreign fetch.

I guess you can think of it that way, yeah.

> On the other hand, though, I don't know if spinning up N worker threads for every network request is a good idea either.

Can't we run all of them on the same worker thread? At least the use cases I can think of don't need multiple workers running in parallel. One SW yields (by calling `fetch()` or `respondWith()`) and another takes over.






---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/921#issuecomment-229596010

Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:32:21 UTC