Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916)

No, this is referring to service workers in the `waiting` state that are being promoted to the `active` state.  So things like FetchEvent have to be held in a queue until the old worker exits per the current spec.  I'm still not sure this is a good idea.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/916#issuecomment-226736984

Received on Friday, 17 June 2016 10:34:59 UTC