Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465)

I am not too worried about the microtask delay; I feel like we discovered a while ago that wasn't a very important part of things. So I think for the default controller the current design is good.

However, I *do* think we should consider "BYOB" writable streams (I guess in this case it's "keep your own buffer"? KYOB?) with an efficient interface. I'm not sure exactly what that looks like or how it works. I guess that ties in to https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/329 and https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/325.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/465#issuecomment-223140036

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 22:09:29 UTC