Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Naming for "v2" ? (#82)

@beidson
With <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL-1/">WebIDL</a> it's "Level n". With <a href="https://w3c.github.io/html/">HTML</a> it's "n.n".

I'd suggest using the "n.n" convention. CSS uses "Level n", but with many modules at the same level that makes more sense. With something like IndexBD - which seems more likely to continue on a linear evolution, 2.0 seems easy to me.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/82#issuecomment-233394500

Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 17:14:47 UTC