- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:45:55 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 07:46:41 UTC
@annevk, you are suggesting for basic types we just use [PermissionName](https://w3c.github.io/permissions/#enumdef-permissionname), right? Name is always required, so that would make sense. And I guess in relation to https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/59, the there could be a second argument for the "PermissionDescriptor" part (as what @jan-ivar seems to suggest). That would avoid the need for any dictionaries to extend PermissionDescriptor. so, something like: ```JS navigator.permissions.query("some-permission", {some: "details"}) ``` --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/42#issuecomment-231663731
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 07:46:41 UTC