Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) from Jake Archibald on 2016-02-23 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:47:08 -0800
To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/839/187725518@github.com>

Yep, understand that, you'd be sending an etag (or last-modified) that represented the SW and its dependencies.

Maybe that's too hacky?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/839#issuecomment-187725518

Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 14:47:39 UTC