Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838)

It means we need to keep the ServiceWorker alive. If there were a good use-case for it, I'd be open to that. The difference from the other async methods is that those methods are all serving an explicit purpose (e.g. do a thing once you've gotten a result out of the database). Is there a good use-case for keeping a SW alive for 100ms and then doing something?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/838#issuecomment-187445236

Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 00:06:28 UTC