Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221)

> @@ -2594,12 +2594,22 @@ <h4 id="should-response-to-request-be-blocked-due-to-nosniff?"><dfn title="shoul
>    <p>If <var>credentials flag</var> is set, run these substeps:
>  
>    <ol>
> -   <li><p>Modify <var>httpRequest</var>'s
> -   <span title=concept-request-header-list>header list</span>
> -   per HTTP State Management Mechanism.
> -   <span data-anolis-ref>COOKIES</span>
> -   <!-- XXX proper hook? -->
> +   <li>
> +    <p>If the user agent is not configured to block cookies for <var>httpRequest</var> (see
> +    <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-7">Section 7</a> of

Lowercase "Section" throughout unless it's at the start of a sentence.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/221/files#r53613175

Received on Monday, 22 February 2016 11:29:25 UTC