Re: [webcomponents] "component tree" is just "node tree" (#384)

See the followings for details:

- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-184700676
- https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-184732751
  
I would like to defer the decision because it depends on https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-184700676

If we decide not to support the distribution for a composed tree whose root tree is not a document tree, we can define a component tree as either a document tree or a shadow tree.

> Also, why is DocumentFragment left out in this concept? All shadow root should be document fragments, right?

A document fragment which is not a shadow root:
- is a node tree
- is a fragment tree
- is a component tree
- is not a primary component tree


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/384#issuecomment-185003052