- From: Stefan Penner <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:38:10 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 22:38:40 UTC
> the fact that this has hit Chrome 49 without needing to be reverted This seems somewhat self-prepatuating, especially since issues have been (and continue to be raised). So by ignoring issues, yes chrome has not needed to revert... > Part of the reason is because those usages already failed in Firefox (in many cases) and Safari (in fewer cases, but more subtly). They're clearly survivable. A path of success was possible, but that changed with Chrome 49. --- It seems transitioning to high-precision timer since posix epoch may address the concerns being raised, with what seems like little cost? Maybe I'm missing something... --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/23#issuecomment-181601376
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 22:38:40 UTC