Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756)

> If the spec is open, I think the wording should be "Does not require to controller !== reg.pushManager.active !== reg.sync.active." Because it could be but it is not mandatory, isn't it?

I'm saying if we are going to do this, we should be explicit and not leave it "open".  Leaving it open means letting browsers do different things that are observable and end up as compat headaches for devs.  Just my opinion, of course.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/756#issuecomment-243215201