Re: [w3c/manifest] Add screenshots object (#477)

> Ah, that makes more sense. However I am not sure I agree with the concern. I am quite certain that my team would be interested in using it.

Ok. That's sweet music to the spec editor's ears 🎸.
 
> We (spec folks) don't have any requirements of the browsers, either. 

Nit pick: but the RCF2119 keywords are conformance requires precisely for browsers. 

> I know that Edge is extremely interested in using them.

Ok, cool. That's what I needed to hear.  

> I am not clear on what the issue is - that user has manifest data. Stores A and B ingest it, user updates the data on Store A, and as a result Store B is out of date?

No, that user updates the data in the manifest, but Store A and B don't update. So, user updates data in Store A and B, but then stops updating the manifest. 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/477#issuecomment-242268884