Re: [whatwg/dom] CDATASection misses (#300)

That's definitely worth consider, but I suspect the current behavior on `normalize()` may be intentional, if you take it as an invariant that calling `normalize()` shouldn't change what is serialized.

So assuming that it's already perfectly interoperable I think just spec'ing that would be best.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/300#issuecomment-240392506