Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reconsider treatment of non-GET for non-HTTP(S) schemes (#339)

And with HEAD we'd force there to be no body? Interesting, but prolly not compelling enough.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/339#issuecomment-239615779

Received on Saturday, 13 August 2016 11:10:59 UTC