Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] navigations that are not intercepted should still allow interception on further redirects (#793)

> Why the check if the flag is unset? Seems redundant.

Sorry. Coming back from other context, I can't remember exactly. Seems redundant though I thought there was a reason.

> Although something close to this is needed if the 401/407 is followed by a redirect.

Yes, this is the scenario I thought unsetting the flag is needed.

> Which is why I think a variable that we pass along rather than a flag stored on request is probably the way to go here.

I'm fine with the way you think of it. But I think I'm not quite clear with the entire flow in detail. I'll give a feedback when you provide an outline or changes to the spec.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/793#issuecomment-238554471