Re: [heycam/webidl] Provide a concise syntax to create IDL dictionaries from prose (#142)

Mhmm, in the case at hand, I happen not to write out any literal arrays, but if I had, I wouldn't intend the page's `%ArrayIteratorPrototype%.next` to be used to create the `sequence<>` object. In most cases, I'd intend only the initial values of the various ES objects to be used, but there are probably some cases where I'd want member access on a user-provided object to use the user's overrides.

I don't really care what syntax we use for WebIDL literals, as long as it's nearly as concise as the ES syntax.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/142#issuecomment-237946750

Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 19:59:57 UTC