Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why does CacheStorage have [SecureContext] but not Cache? (#941)

I can see wanting `[SecureContext]` on the interface if there's a constructor and therefore we should be consistent for types without constructors. Although not a technical requirement (so maybe not in http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#SecureContext) we should probably be consistent in the platform and document it somewhere. Hence pestering @mikewest :)

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/941#issuecomment-237641262

Received on Thursday, 4 August 2016 18:29:23 UTC