- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 22:56:21 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2016 05:56:51 UTC
> #59 just means that we should specify the interface slightly differently, or that implementations will have to use different WebIDL than we have in the spec. @jyasskin or @jan-ivar, sorry, I don't understand why tho. Is it possible to provide a brief explanation or point me to the right place in the WebIDL spec so I can understand what doesn't work interoperably? Also, should we do one argument, that allows `PermissionName` or `PermissionDescriptor`. Having a single argument could work similarly to how `fetch()` allows either a `Request` or `USVString` as `RequestInfo`. As in: ```JS navigator.permissions.query("geolocation"); navigator.permissions.query({name: "geolocation", otherStuff: ""}); ``` --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/42#issuecomment-237149115
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2016 05:56:51 UTC