Re: [editing] RESOLUTION: We are going to focus on describing ce=typing as a priority. (#85)

Technically, you are right that cE=typing probably also should have the direct IME-access. But given we are in a situation where we finally have a compromise after 10-15 years of chaos, I think we are much better off allowing for some mild inconsistency in this first version of the spec. The point is that cE=typing, once implemented, will be directly usable, whereas the lower levels won't due to the lack of IME support. Once we spec cE=events with access to the inner workings of IME in a few years, we should also get access to that in cE=typing.

I am afraid we have to choose between either taking the deal as offered by browser makers, or just forget about it.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/85#issuecomment-134664678