Re: [editing] Definition of "Invisible elements" is vague (#68)

> So given these circumstances, does that mean that you would be in favor of making the list more specific? Would you be willing to make that list?

After some thoughts, my proposal would be to define as `display: none` only. Other *invisible elements* are to be handled by JS, possibly with help from some other rules to be defined in #70.

The motivation is that when `display: none`, CSS defines that UA should not generate boxes. That makes browser developers a little hard to handle such elements the same way as other elements.

As originally pointed out, there are other *invisible elements* that, from user perspective, should be skipped, but if JS can handle them, that looks ideal to me.

What do you think?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/68#issuecomment-132206960