[Bug 27775] [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27775

--- Comment #6 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
As I mentioned in comment #0, what 'default' should be orthogonal to the
problem which this bug is trying to resolve.

Whatever the default would be, 'open' or 'closed, I don't see any effect of
that on the behavior of closed shadow trees. Do you think the current behavior
of UA shadow trees will be affected by the default? I don't think so.

I appreciate if you guys give us comments about the concrete behavior of closed
shadow trees in this bug, if you have, as Philip did about '>>>'.

As for '>>>', yeah, I agree that '>>>' shouldn't piece closed shadow trees.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 01:40:38 UTC