[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #16 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> ---
(In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #13)
> For example, the following codes could be in (3), but not in (4):
> 
> - A node is a child node of a shadow host, but the node is not distributed
> to any insertion points.
> - A node is in the older shadow tree, but the younger shadow tree doesn't
> have <shadow>  element.
> - A node is a child of content insertion points.
> 
> These nodes couldn't participate in the composed tree.

I see. In Gecko we're going to make, at least for now until the spec
is clarified, nodes in a shadow host, but not distributed, to behave
like it was in a disconnected subtree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 09:41:17 UTC