[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #27 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> ---
Do f and g actually belong to D. I'd expect f and g to behave as if they were
in a disconnected subtree which has ShadowRoot as the root.
f and g after all don't affect to layout nor participate event propagation
path.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 11:00:40 UTC