- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 05:03:33 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26973 --- Comment #3 from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> --- (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #2) > Yeah, having generic map/filter that apply to any iterable and live on > Iterator.prototype (and perhaps some prototypes of other iterables like Set > and Map) would be really nice! Iterator not iterable, so if Map and Set have standard iterators that delegate to Iterator.prototype, then everything works automagically. You name a map or set on the right of for-of's 'of' and @@iterator does the rest. Having Map.prototype.map do the @@iterator call and delegate to the returned iterator's map is doable but seems unnecessary when using for-of. When calling someMap.filter directly, of course, it's wanted. Some design freedom here to "do both", IMHO. /be -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 5 October 2014 05:03:36 UTC