[Bug 26365] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

--- Comment #30 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
No, the actual is:

- #c (or #d) is *not* in the composed tree (with document as root).

  These nodes are child nodes of the shadow host (#a), however, they are not
distributed at all.

- However, #c (or #d) is "in a document".


A "composed document" (D) might be a good name for D, but I'm afraid that it is
confusing name for D because #c (or #d) must belong to D, but #c (or #d) is not
in the composed tree (with document as root).

I think "composed document" might be a good name for "C", "composed tree (with
document as root), rather.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 01:46:25 UTC