[Bug 24576] Calling URL.createObjectURL() on a closed Blob

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24576

--- Comment #11 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> ---
(In reply to Arun from comment #8)
> No; this was based on discussions in IRC, and is a change.

OK. Do you remember the rationale (or is it logged)?

> Do you disagree?
> If so, why?

I would expect close() on a closed blob to be a no-op. I don't see much value
in throwing. If you don't know if a blob is closed or not but want to close it,
it seems like you would have to wrap it in a try/catch block. What is the
benefit?

Possibly relevant is WebSocket#close() which is no-op if the socket is closed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 12:36:50 UTC