[Bug 27684] New: Handling of .contentType is not interoperable

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27684

            Bug ID: 27684
           Summary: Handling of .contentType is not interoperable
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DOM
          Assignee: annevk@annevk.nl
          Reporter: robin@w3.org
        QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, www-dom@w3.org

We're observing pretty varying behaviour for .contentType, looking at this
test:

    http://w3c-test.org/dom/nodes/Document-createElement-namespace.html

Parts of the failures are for synthetic documents. For those, both WebKit and
Blink use the content type that would "ideally" match the namespace given to
createDocument() instead of "application/xml". I somehow suspect that the issue
(at least in the way in which it is implemented) is related to bug 19431.

Other failures, notably in Blink, apply to remotely-loaded documents, notably
involving attempts to change the content type by swapping the root element
while loading:

    Vanilla load XHTML as application/xml:
http://w3c-test.org/dom/nodes/Document-createElement-namespace-tests/xhtml.xml
    Try changing to SVG:
http://w3c-test.org/dom/nodes/Document-createElement-namespace-tests/xhtml_ns_changed.xml
    Try changing to without namespace:
http://w3c-test.org/dom/nodes/Document-createElement-namespace-tests/xhtml_ns_removed.xml


The externally-loaded ones likely ought to be handled by other specifications
that build DOMs (in this case HTML), but I am including them in case the
additional data helps.

The synthetic cases however ought to be defined by the DOM, and we're lacking
interoperability today. Gecko sticks to the spec (Unless stated otherwise, a
document's (...) content type is "application/xml") but it would seem that no
one else does. It is worth tracking whether this is something that implementers
wish to align on or not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 15:31:17 UTC