- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:10:32 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21886
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjmiles@chromium.org
--- Comment #6 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It would have to be. I really don't like the magical "guess the name" APIs
> in general. Proposal A seems like the way to go.
If we're going with A, should the base element name be:
1) the second optional argument in document.register. The drawback here is that
for some values of options.prototype, the argument is _not_ optional, which is
somewhat confusing.
2) another option of ElementRegistrationOptions. The drawback here is that in
ES6, this will be just a static class member, and then people will be asking,
"why is that here?" And "why isn't name there as well?"
Also adding Scott, who comes with opinions.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 22:10:37 UTC