[Bug 21067] [Shadow]: Provide an api to insertionParent

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21067

--- Comment #15 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> event.path() was landed in blink as described in
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21066#c25.
> 
> Although we still have to spec event.path(), I'd like to know whether we
> still need insertionParent or not because event.path() might be sufficient.
> 
> 
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > Agreed. I'd like to avoid adding API unless there is a strong use case for
> > that.
> > 
> > (In reply to comment #12)
> > > For events XBL1 has .originalTarget but I really hope we don't add similar
> > > thing for web components. As little as possible of the shadow DOM should be
> > > exposed outside.

Okay. I will wait to add insertionParent to the spec until webdevs (Polymer
teams and others) have concluded that event.path is not enough.

If that happens, I think we need to go back to re-evaluate the opportunities
for a better solution (and maybe even nix event.path in the process).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 16:38:07 UTC