[Bug 21305] [Shadow]: :visited selectors are dangerous

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21305

Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bzbarsky@mit.edu

--- Comment #2 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
If every UA is just going to never match :visited in here, what's the point of
allowing it and leading people to try using it?

Is it just to allow them to copy/paste existing ":link,:visited" selectors?

That said, why are we restricting the set of selectors at all?  The spec
doesn't say, and without an explanation of the goal it's impossible to tell
whether this restriction is even the right approach, much less whether the set
of things restricted to is correct.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 17:37:34 UTC