[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17242

--- Comment #8 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> 2012-10-09 14:54:13 UTC ---
So yeah, that is a dead horse. We try to avoid introducing new APIs that does
largely the same thing, because the costs (implementation, tests, potential for
even more divergence) outweigh the benefit.

So far however there does not appear to be much interest in AnonXMLHttpRequest
at all. I marked it as such in the specification: http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 14:54:15 UTC