W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2012

[Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:09:33 +0000
To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20158-2532-qk24ctbYdW@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20158

Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bzbarsky@mit.edu

--- Comment #1 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
How would you define such a thing interoperably?

Having explicit names for keys in dictionaries means that the IDL author also
defines an explicit order on the keys.  But if you allow arbitrary names,
what's the key order?  Note that key order matters when getters with
side-effects are involved...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:09:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:09:40 GMT