- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:47:07 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20131 --- Comment #5 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> --- It would be odd if script library A observing mutations without oldValue would get oldValue. That would be even error prone: scripts might rely on the data to not be there if they are not observing it. So, records should be per observer. If implementations want to share the internal data, that is ofc ok, but better to not expose that to JS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:47:09 UTC