- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:34:16 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17222 --- Comment #2 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2012-05-28 14:34:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > So now each time we talk about redirects we have to reference two documents? Is > there not some better way? In theory you could just talk about the semantics of the status code (does it really have "redirection semantics" as per category 1 in <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-19.html#status.3xx>), and point the reader to the IANA registry for status codes. The bigger issue here is that, optimally, HTTPbis would answer this question for unknown 3xx codes as well (because, after all, introducing 308 shouldn't require special support from browsers). But then, with the addition of 308, the set of "real" redirect codes should be complete anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 14:34:20 UTC