[Bug 17023] [Shadow]: Can an InsertionPoint be a shadow host?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17023

--- Comment #7 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> 2012-05-11 04:54:00 UTC ---
Note that I've used a *active* InsertionPoint.
For inactive InsertionPoints, attaching a ShadowRoot does take effect.

(In reply to comment #6)
> In the current WebKit implementation:
>   1. A shadow root attached to InsertionPoint is simply ignored and not used at
> all. InsertionPoints still works as InsertionPoint.
>   2. We don't throw any exception when attaching a shadowRoot to
> insertionPoints.
> 
> For 1). it sounds reasonable for me.
> For 2). It might be worth discussing whether we should throw exception or not.
> 
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > It doesn’t matter if what WebKit does is deliberate or not… I believe it is
> > just being an example of what the semantics should be.
> > 
> > I don’t like the suggested behavior in Comment 1 (if I understand it.) It seems
> > inconsistent.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 04:54:04 UTC