- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:37:18 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15454 --- Comment #2 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-03-20 19:37:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I disagree that templates should _have_ a substitution system, but I fully > support the idea that they should make applying a substitution system easy. > > Rather than try to force a 'one size fits all' model, I suggest it is more > worthwhile to provide a good model to define templates in the markup and a > useful pattern to plug an "applier" in. There are already numerous existing, > well established projects that do substitution on templates as strings and if > you look at how different they are in feature and philosophy - it seems > infinitely better to allow individual, established (and new upstart) vendors to > compete on that front. This makes sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 19:37:21 UTC