[Bug 16350] Fix occurances of RFC2119 terms in notes

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16350

Travis Leithead [MSFT] <travil@microsoft.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needsReview
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jrossi@microsoft.com,
                   |                            |Ms2ger@gmail.com,
                   |                            |simonp@opera.com
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Travis Leithead [MSFT] <travil@microsoft.com> 2012-03-13 23:09:44 UTC ---
Adding a few folks who participated on the thread.

------
I did a run through the entire spec to try and make all the notes
RFC2119-clean. The latest revision of the spec has these changes. Please review
to see if this satisfies this bug.

(Note, there may be other occurances of RFC2119 terms used _outside_ of notes,
where the intent of the spec author may have been to specify a note. If you
come across these, please report them as new bugs!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 23:09:47 UTC