W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 15954] [Shadow]: The dilemma of document DOM tree mutations

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:14:11 +0000
To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1S2sip-0002pl-0o@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15954

Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cam@mcc.id.au

--- Comment #4 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-02-29 23:14:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, if you add something to the light DOM, it should be prefixed so that you
> have a reasonable expectation of avoiding collisions.
> 
> The idea of applying an "overlay" from the shadow to the light dom is
> interesting.

don't SVGInstances have something like that?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:14:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:14:12 GMT