W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2012

[Bug 18551] [IndexedDB] Ambiguity about operations preceding a failed createIndex.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:08:25 +0000
Message-Id: <E1T2O9x-0006Lx-Kw@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18551

Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |odinho@opera.com

--- Comment #3 from Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com> 2012-08-17 15:08:25 UTC ---
I agree with Jonas, and what I seem to be picking up is the preferred way by
Joshua and Alec too(?).

I forgot a bit about this thread, but I made some tests exhibiting what I think
it should work like. They might contain errors, but Firefox actually passed
them when I was pleased with them anyway. So Gecko and the tests have to share
the bug if so.

http://w3c-test.org/webapps/IndexedDB/tests/submissions/Opera/idbobjectstore_createIndex6-event_order.htm
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/IndexedDB/tests/submissions/Opera/idbobjectstore_createIndex7-event_order.htm
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/IndexedDB/tests/submissions/Opera/idbobjectstore_createIndex8-deleteIndex-event_order.htm

There is need for even more of tests like that.

I also think this should apply to createObjectStore, deleteObjectStore as well
as createIndex and deleteIndex for symmetry.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:08:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 August 2012 15:08:27 GMT