https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16357 --- Comment #7 from Travis Leithead [MSFT] <travil@microsoft.com> 2012-04-10 22:22:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > So you'd define event constructors non-normatively along with a reference to > DOM4? Why not just point to the UI Events draft? But either way that seems fine > to me. The event constructors follow naturally from the event interface so it's > not like we can change them anyway once we agreed on the event interface. Oh, I misinterpreted your use of the word "them" as referring to init* methods. You were actually thinking of event constructors. I was actually planning on just moving the init* methods for CompositionEvent and WheelEvent to a non-normative appendix and describe them there for completeness, but perhaps just describing the event constructors in the same place non-normatively would be sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 22:22:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 April 2012 22:22:39 GMT