Hi, Maciej- Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 5/27/08 5:38 PM): > > I could not find record of any such objection in the Advisory Committee > mailing list archives, or any record of an official W3C decision on this > point. As Team contact, could you please explain who made this decision > and on what basis? There was a substantive AC Representatives review comment regarding this deliverable, but it was a Team-only comment, and thus there's not much I can say about it. It's not my favorite way of operating, and I wish I could say more, but at the same time, I have to honor Member confidentiality. You can see my original charter proposal here (an earlier draft that includes the Geolocation API): http://www.w3.org/2007/12/WebApps-Charter/WebApp-Charter-2007-proposed http://www.w3.org/2007/12/WebApps-Charter/webapps-deliverables.html I want to reiterate that W3C is *not* dropping the Geolocation API... we merely propose to move it to a dedicated WG. I am ambivalent about this myself: on the one hand, I think there is considerable momentum and interest in doing this in the WebApps WG; on the other, it's a subject that many Members may want to join, who are not necessarily interested in other WebApps deliverables. There is something to be said for having a subject covered exclusively by a dedicated WG with a manageable mailing list load, too. :) Again, we are actively encouraging all interested parties to join this new Geolocation WG, and we will expedite its creation as far as we can. Don't panic. :) Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPIReceived on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:07:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:07:49 GMT