On Mon, 26 May 2008 12:18:34 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > I do think that setting the header to the empty string (as if "" had been > passed instead) is better behaviour, from an author's point of view. If > that would resolve this issue then that seems like a good choice. As far as I can tell three out of four browsers stringify to "null" / "undefined" for arbitrary headers and since authors should pass a string anyway I really don't think it's worth changing this. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 10:37:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 May 2008 10:37:39 GMT