- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:38:08 +0200
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 May 2008 13:22:50 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren: >> The example for [Undefined] should probably say [Null=Null, >> Undefined=Null] because just saying [Undefined=Null] doesn't make much >> sense. > > Because why would you want undefined to map to null, but null to map to > "null"? Yeah, that's seems odd. > Or because undefined would map to null, which then would in > turn map to "null"? (The latter isn’t my intention.) I didn't think of this one, that seems even weirder :-) As a data point, for XMLHttpRequest a shorthand for [Null=Null, Undefined=Null] would be nice. That's the only one of this [Null]/[Undefined] madness I need and I have to write it out four times. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2008 11:38:56 UTC