W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2008

Re: XHR LC comment: Accept header went from MUST NOT to SHOULD

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:10:17 +0200
To: "Laurens Holst" <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ua8o3fe264w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:56:42 +0200, Laurens Holst  
<lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote:
> Why was this changed? Why should user agents pretend that they know what
> kind of resource the user expects by setting an Accept header that is
> unreliable? FWIW, Internet Explorer and Safari set the (reasonably
> acceptable */*), but it would be better to leave it out entirely. Also  
> see:
>
> http://www.grauw.nl/blog/entry/470

It was pointed out by another Last Call comment that not setting the  
Accept header causes servers to break. Given the results above I suppose  
we could require that for XMLHttpRequest purposes it is at least always  
set to */*. Would that work?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 09:10:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 May 2008 09:10:51 GMT