Re: XHR LC comments

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> The spec can't be more "ready" than all normative references.
>>> Sure it can. The concept of "origin" (for instance) is pretty well
>>> understood by browser vendors, and HTML5 is getting progressively closer to
>>> defining it. XHR1 doesn't need it to be perfectly defined to make use of it.
>>> Same with Window, probably even more so in fact.
>> So why then is the reference to HTML5 needed?
> 
> Wouldn't you just complain that Window and 'origin' were totally undefined 
> if we used them without referencing something?

That wasn't what I was suggesting.

BR, Julian